Deficient explanation of ZPIZ decisions
Following the intervention of the Human Rights Ombudsman of the Republic of Slovenia (Ombudsman), the second-instance decision of the Pension and Disability Insurance Institute of Slovenia (ZPIZ) was “roughly” issued within the four-month statutory term, while the four-month statutory... more
Children with comparable needs must be enabled comparable use of rights
Po mnenju Varuha človekovih pravic Republike Slovenije bi bile kršene pravice iz 14. in 56. člena Ustave RS, če se eden od učencev zaradi zdravstvenih težav, za razliko od drugih učencev z enakimi težavami, ne bi mogel udeležiti šole v naravi, zgolj zaradi nejasnosti, kako bo financirana... more
Is a non-proceeding party just an unnecessary obstacle?
Varuh je obravnaval pobudo, s katero je pobudnik Mestni občini Ljubljana očital, da ni odločila o njegovih vlogah v zvezi z vstopom v konkretne postopke izdajanja dovoljenj za začasno čezmerno obremenitev okolja s hrupom in tudi njegovem predlogu za obnovo določenega postopka. Očitki so... more
Is it really necessary to provide evidence with an expert in the procedures for obtaining rights from disability insurance?
Varuh meni, da bi Zavod za pokojninsko in invalidsko zavarovanje v ugotovitvenih postopkih, v katerih je to mogoče, namesto dokaza z izvedenskim organom lahko izvedel dokaz z izvedeno pričo ali drugim dokaznim sredstvom ter tako skrajšal čas odločanja o pravicah iz invalidskega... more
Unacceptably long waiting periods for an orthodontist examination
While using the zVEM portal, a complainant whose daughter had an appointment to be examined by an orthodontist accidentally discovered a few months before an examination that her daughter's referral for an orthodontist examination had been cancelled, about which she was not informed. The... more
Back 
