Paternity leave should be used during the time the child is staying with the family
Summary
In the opinion of the Human Rights Ombudsman of the Republic of Slovenia, it is not consistent with the objectives of Directive (EU) 2019/1158 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on the balance of work and private life of parents and carers, and repealing Council Directive 2010/18/EU, if the father of a child who spends the first three months of his or her life in hospital cannot take paternity leave immediately after the child returns from hospital. The Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities did not agree with the Ombudsman's position, which is why the Ombudsman also sought the position of the European Commission.Details
The Human Rights Ombudsman of the
Republic of Slovenia (Ombudsman) considered a complaint concerning the
right to exercise paternity leave under the Parental Care and Family
Benefits Act (ZSDP-1). The complainant stated that he had become the
father of quadruplets who had been in the maternity hospital for just
under three months since their birth. Therefore, the complainant was
unable to use the paternity leave that he was otherwise entitled to in
the case of the birth of quadruplets until the children were three
months old, after their arrival home from the maternity hospital. The
complainant could therefore use paternity leave while the children were
in the maternity hospital and would not be providing care for the
children, but in accordance with the regulations of the Republic of
Slovenia, he could not use paternity leave after the children had
already reached the age of three months.
The Ombudsman
addressed an inquiry to the Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Affairs
and Equal Opportunities (MDDSZ) regarding the application of the
provision of Article 27 of the ZSDP-1 in the event that a child is
hospitalised for the first three months after birth, in light of the
fact that paternity leave is intended for fathers to participate in the
care and protection of the child together with the mother, even at the
most tender age of the child. The purpose of paternity leave is to
encourage a more equal distribution of care responsibilities between
women and men and to enable the early creation of bonds between fathers
and children. The Ombudsman asked the MDDSZ for an explanation as to
why, in exceptional cases, which is certainly the case when a child
stays in hospital for three months after birth, paternity leave is not
available even after three months have passed since the birth of the
child. In the Ombudsman's opinion, this would best follow the purpose of
paternity leave and the objective of Directive (EU) 2019/1158 of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on the
reconciliation of work and private life of parents and carers and
repealing Council Directive 2010/18/EU (the Directive), that paternity
leave must be taken around the birth of the child and must be clearly
linked to the birth of the child for the purposes of providing care,
thereby promoting a more equal distribution of care responsibilities
between women and men and enabling the early creation of bonds between
fathers and children. At the same time, in the Ombudsman's opinion, the
existing regulation of the ZSDP-1, which allows the father to take
paternity leave even if the child is in hospital, when a large, if not
all, part of the care is taken over by the hospital staff, and not even
after the parents start to provide full care and protection to the
child, i.e. after the child is discharged from the hospital, seems to be
contrary to the objective of the Directive. In this way, part of the
objective of the Directive, that paternity leave must be taken around
the birth of the child, is, in the Ombudsman's opinion, treated as an
absolute priority over part of the objective of the Directive, that
paternity leave must be granted for the purposes of providing care. Only
after discharge from the hospital does the Ombudsman consider that the
period begins when the purpose of paternity leave can be adequately
achieved in the best interests of the child and in support of the
mother.
It is precisely in connection with the stated purpose
that, in the Ombudsman's opinion, the warnings of the European
Commission, to which the MDDSZ also referred, that the father must take
paternity leave upon the birth of the child or very close to this event,
should be understood. In relation to the stated warnings, the MDDSZ did
not submit documentation from which the exact content of these warnings
would be evident; the MDDSZ merely stated that the European Commission
had repeatedly emphasised during the negotiations for the adoption of
the Directive that the father must take paternity leave upon the birth
of the child or very close to this event. In the Ombudsman's opinion,
such an emphasis cannot be understood as meaning that the speed of use
is more important than achieving the purpose and objective of the right,
that paternity leave is granted for the purposes of providing care.
The Ombudsman further warned the MDDSZ that the currently valid legal
regulation, the ZSDP-1, treats two groups of fathers who are in
different situations equally, namely fathers who can begin providing
care and attention immediately after the birth of the child, and fathers
who can begin providing care and attention later, in the event that the
child is in the care and attention of medical personnel for the first
months of life. On the other hand, in the Ombudsman's opinion, the
ZSDP-1 gives different treatment to two categories of persons who are
essentially in a comparable situation, namely fathers whose child does
not yet live in the home environment in the first months of life for
objective reasons beyond the father's control, and on the other hand,
adoptive parents for whom, in accordance with the provision of Paragraph
2 of Article 27 of the ZSDP-1, the three-month period for using
paternity leave only begins to run properly upon the placement of the
child in the adoptive family, which could also represent a discrepancy
with the right to equality before the law, protected by Article 14 of
the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia, which requires that
comparable situations of beneficiaries be treated comparably and
different situations be treated differently.
Based on the
above, the Ombudsman proposed that the MDDSZ amend the current
legislation in a way that would be consistent with the purpose of the
Directive and would also enable fathers of children who are hospitalised
for the first few months to take paternity leave after the child begins
living in their home environment.
The MDDSZ rejected the
Ombudsman's proposal, but at the same time did not explain how, in
exceptional cases, such as a child's stay in hospital for the first
three months of life, the purpose of the right to paternity leave is
achieved, namely that fathers should participate in the care and
protection of the child together with the mother from the child's
earliest years, in order to encourage a more equal distribution of care
responsibilities between women and men.
Given the Ombudsman's
opinion that the legal regulation in question is not in line with the
purpose and objectives of the Directive, the Ombudsman brought the
matter to the attention of the European Commission, which, in accordance
with the provisions of Article 17 of the Treaty on European Union and
Article 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ensures the appropriateness of the transposition of the Directive into
the internal legal order of Member States and, in accordance with the
provision of Article 18 of the Directive, prepares a report to the
European Parliament and the Council. In accordance with the provision of
Article 288 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the
Directive leaves the choice of form and methods to the national
authorities, but is binding as to the aim to be achieved. The Ombudsman
has asked the European Commission to inform him of its position on the
compatibility of the provisions of the ZSDP-1 with the Directive.
9.0-13/2024